thats the same thing; this is almost as long loll
Tsunami's Paladin Guide! Part 1
so low dex and low def makes a class bad? what about priest and sorc?
letās just leave it at this. itās neither bad nor broken
Wands also have 9 range. Csword has 4.5 and that 4.5 is too little for me to enjoy using (I pretty much main it the rare occassion I play melee) But offer me to play trickster with a fire dagger as an alternative? Iād take it in a heartbeat because decoys are fun, 75 spd is fun, 75 dex is fun, 5.6 range is bearable. The only thing remotely insteresting about paladin is he has 55 spd. Tbatās the only positive I have for the class is that. But thatās also because survivability isnāt a major concern for me since literally nest/tomb are the only things that really give me any level of concern.
TLDR: I like enterntaining abilities, more range then csword, high dex and spd. Pally has none of these properties.
I guess thatās fair. I was arguing about why itās not bad, but boring is subjective and thereās nothing I can say about that
I personally donāt understand why pleb is calling it bad ( I mean its a melee, it canāt have too little damage as swords are dumb) as Iād say pally is far easier to play then warr(although warr is my favorite melee because speedy heh) The complaint about low defense has always driven me crazy as well, 50 defense is plenty as long as you donāt think you can just perfectly stand on ghost gods like youāre a knight. Itās just ridiculously boring, strong, and easy to play in my opinion.
Uhhhhh I just threw all of that on there, Iām maxing that dude and playing him once heās 8/8. Itās actually a pretty decent set imo.
This topic was automatically closed 60 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.