bracer is not better, because warrior doesnt need mp
Ring for Warrior Poll
Probably 'cause bracer has 2 extra of an offensive stat and def (very important on warrior), for -40 hp. Pyra and bracer are pretty similar in effect on a warrior, bracer just looks cooler.
if youre using bracer on a warrior, that 60 mp is gonna go to waste because you dont need mp as a warrior, especially if you have a max rare pet +. so with that said, youre trading 40 hp for 2 def and 2 att. not worth
Gunna go with bracer since the balance of of the def, att, mp, and hp corresponds really well and can make warrior have a really high potential
that doesnt make sense
[quote=“KevinPoloo, post:13, topic:18673”]
hp corresponds really well
[/quote] if hp corresponds really well, then why bracer over pyra. pyra gives 40 more hp.
[quote=“KevinPoloo, post:13, topic:18673”]
balance of of the def, att, mp, and hp
[/quote] does a warrior really need mana? he doesnt even have a jugg on which uses quite a bit more mana than others.
when will the mp come in handy? if youre constantly pressing the space bar with a maxed rare pet + you can probably keep doing that for 5 minutes. then stop for like 30 seconds and refill all your mp back. 40 hp is better than an extra 2 def and att
My god, people actually voted for an mp ring for the warrior?!
It’s literally the same as the rogue in one thing: you can’t spam your ability and your pet just regens your mp to the point that a mp ring is absolutely useless.
Mp ring wasn’t an option? Unless you’re talking about nile but I don’t consider it an mp ring.
Well sir, you can check by looking either st the “show results” section, or the screenshot above that @Tauntauned provided.
That wasn’t my aim.
What actually was, is to say they were stupid for choosing that option.