Tackling RWT, but an extreme method

#62

I saw those ninja edits :wink:

#63

I pressed some weird combo of keys and it sent the reply before I was done typing ;-;

#64

No itā€™s not.

I already acknowledged that it is a bad idea in the 1st placeā€¦

???

I donā€™t understand your analogies you made here. If the mechanics are flawed, it can be improved.

You got me there budā€¦

#65

Itā€™s the same thing you are saying in different scenarios.

#66

Go in a realm and walk around a little bit. Standing in nexus wont do much lol

#67

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

#68

what the fuck is going on here

#69

Yeah I do.

Nah itā€™s not. And no, I am not trolling.

If it doesnā€™t need to be fixed, it means that it is ok to have RWTā€™s.

Basically you are saying that we shouldnā€™t give a crap anymore.

#70

You are talking to a RWT shop owner/affiliate you can be sure he doesnā€™t want you to give a crap.

#71

Ohā€¦ didnā€™t know thatā€¦

#72
#73

But it does not mean you should break the ToS. Talking to Blacklist BTW.

And even if Deca has no plan to tackle RWTā€™s, I still view them not moral the 1st place.

#76

Ok

Iā€™ve never broken ToS

#77

You run rwt, which is against tos.

#78

RWT is not agaisnt the ToS

#79

RWT is by definition against rotmgā€™s ToS, see here section 6.1.1

additionally endorsing or promoting RWT (or any other actions within rotmg that would break Decaā€™s ToS such as downloading and using hacked clients) is against our rules on this forum.

#83

Me reading this entire thread:
:neutral_face::confused::hushed::popcorn::face_with_raised_eyebrow::grimacing::no_good_woman:

Aaandā€¦no longer tracking this thread.

The General Chat Thread v2
#84

I do think your idea of turning trade able stā€™s soul bound is great no reason for them not to considering every other st is as for accounts, hacking, duping. Letā€™s take it one problem at a time and cut off even if itā€™s one single source of their hold. I havenā€™t lost hope but it seems no matter what you say someone is gonna get upset you could have a perfect solution and some how some way they will find a way to complain.

#85

(I plan on hanging on to my legacy STs anyway, thank you)

Mixed feelings on SBing them. I do have to remind myself that duping would probably be noticeable enough to cause problems, but also, what if someone wanted to experience what the legacy sets were like and are now unable? Iā€™m probably biased, but thatā€™s a sad thought for me.

#86

I tried something else like there will be a fame box for Legacy sets at a rare occassion (note it will be random time). Basically, it will cost 10k fame per roll (up to 4 times). And just this idea myself, I addressed its pro 'n cons (there may be more).

Pro:

Reduce the reliance on RWTā€™s to obtain the respective items.

As Book mentioned, it gives an opportunity for someone to experience what the legacy sets were like.

It gives an additional use of leftover fame.

Cons:

Heavily relies on RNG when it comes to rolling the boxes.

Such items may lose their uniqueness of being ā€œlegacyā€ and their value.

Fame exploits and duping will be fixed 1st before it becomes a thing.